[Shake-dev] shakemap 3.2 bug reports

[Vince Quitoriano]

Hi Bill,

The 'retrieve' program is hard-coded in to the 'shake' script to run 
first (I believe
it's because the other programs depend on it to create the 
data/[event]/input/event.xml
structure.) I'll need to fix this in the next release.

The forward station file requires the agency and description. Actually
the code doesn't explicitly require that, but it expects
a pair of single quotes (from the description value). It looks like your
file only has (lat, lon, stationID). You can try changing line 2126

       ($line =~ /^(.*?),(.*?),(.*?),(.*?),(.*?),\'(.*?)\'$/);

to
       ($line =~ /^(.*?),(.*?),(.*?)[,(.*?),(.*?),\'(.*?)\']$/);

This should be fixed too.

- Vince

Bill Gustafson wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I have two odd bug reports to make, both regarding scenarios.
> 
> When trying to run scenarios on my shakemap 3.2 Linux install, I found 
> that grind expected retrieve to be run first, even though the 
> scenario_skip list included retrieve.  I had to manually comment out 
> retrieve or add it to the no_dep list (I tried both), for the shakemap 
> to run properly.
> 
> When trying to run scenarios on my shakemap 3.2 Solaris install, it 
> chokes on the stavel_file (or maybe the fwstatlist, which is the same 
> file) in grind:
> 
> [agita][SHAKE][38] /earthworm/SHAKE/bin/../bin/grind -event 
> seattle_fault_se -qtm -boundcheck -lonspan 3.2 -psa
> grind: Running scenario seattle_fault_se with flags: -event 
> seattle_fault_se -qtm -boundcheck -lonspan 3.2 -psa
> Regression: No source mechanism specified. Using default.
> grind: 0 stations flagged out this iteration
> grind: Using estimates.xml as input.
> grind: Parsing forward stations in 
> /earthworm/SHAKE/bin/../lib/grind/dig_pnw.txt.
> grind: Invalid format in /earthworm/SHAKE/bin/../lib/grind/dig_pnw.txt
> 47.0500,-122.9000,2101,190
> 
> It works fine in regular mode on the Solaris install, and it works fine 
> on the Linux install both for scenario and regular mode.
> 
> I will continue working on it, but wanted to make sure I sent this off.
> 
> Bill
>