[ANSS-netops] l4c
David S. Croker
croker at usgs.gov
Tue Mar 6 01:57:21 UTC 2012
Greg, Steve,
Interesting stories that I can't say I ever knew. After talking to
Scott Bowen at Sercel, he definitely verified that. He's been with
Mark Products/Sercel for 30 years and he remembers that the reversal
was already in place when he started. So, I'm guessing that IRIS and
other university cooperators are using L-4C's that are reverse
polarity from USGS networks? Interesting.
The geophone cables/caps that we ordered, however, are all supposed
to come out of the factory wired one way. He acknowledged they made
a mistake in manufacturing and missed it during QC. Of course they
are replacing the cables for us, but not after a bit of extra
work. Just wanted others to be conscience of the issue.
Dave
At 06:10 AM 3/5/2012, Greg Steiner wrote:
>FYI, the polarity difference is not restricted to just the L-4. All
>sensors (nominally called geophones) manufactured by exploration
>type sources are backwards versus seismological standards. This is
>because the exploration standard is based on the movement of the
>inertial mass not the case. for them movement of the inertial mass
>up or in the desired direction produces a positive output. I'm a bit
>surprised that the USGS was able to get them to invert their
>connections in sensors made for them. this certainly muddies the water.
>Greg Steiner
>
>On 3/5/2012 6:00 AM,
><mailto:anss-netops-request at geohazards.usgs.gov>anss-netops-request at geohazards.usgs.gov
>wrote:
>>
>>Send ANSS-netops mailing list submissions to
>>
>><mailto:anss-netops at geohazards.usgs.gov>anss-netops at geohazards.usgs.gov
>>
>>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>
>><https://geohazards.usgs.gov/mailman/listinfo/anss-netops>https://geohazards.usgs.gov/mailman/listinfo/anss-netops
>>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>
>><mailto:anss-netops-request at geohazards.usgs.gov>anss-netops-request at geohazards.usgs.gov
>>
>>You can reach the person managing the list at
>>
>><mailto:anss-netops-owner at geohazards.usgs.gov>anss-netops-owner at geohazards.usgs.gov
>>
>>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>than "Re: Contents of ANSS-netops digest..."
>>
>>
>>Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. L-4C sensors (Steve Estes)
>>
>>
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>Message: 1
>>Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 10:00:45 -0900
>>From: Steve Estes <mailto:estes at gi.alaska.edu><estes at gi.alaska.edu>
>>To: <mailto:anss-netops at geohazards.usgs.gov>anss-netops at geohazards.usgs.gov
>>Cc: Guy Tytgat <mailto:guy at passcal.nmt.edu><guy at passcal.nmt.edu>
>>Subject: [ANSS-netops] L-4C sensors
>>Message-ID:
>><mailto:5F6AAFDB-1974-4021-BCAF-62796618FA90 at gi.alaska.edu><5F6AAFDB-1974-4021-BCAF-62796618FA90 at gi.alaska.edu>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>>We ordered some L4C's awhile back and discovered the same thing.
>>The polarity was reversed. Well, at least it was different.
>>After discussing the issue with the manufacture (I don't remember
>>if it was Mark Products or Sercel),
>>we were told that they make all USGS orders oneway, and everyone
>>else's the other way.
>>
>>As I recall the story, the USGS evaluated the original prototype
>>and found the polarity reversed.
>>Mark Products, wanting to please their customer, manufactured all
>>subsequent USGS L4C's to the USGS spec.
>>All others were made with the original polarity.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Steve Estes
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:34:11 -0800
>>>From: "David S. Croker" <mailto:croker at usgs.gov><croker at usgs.gov>
>>>To: <mailto:anss-netops at geohazards.usgs.gov>anss-netops at geohazards.usgs.gov
>>>Subject: [ANSS-netops] L-4C users beware
>>>Message-ID:
>>><mailto:OFD86DC885.EBFA1C35-ON882579B5.00767C4A at usgs.gov><OFD86DC885.EBFA1C35-ON882579B5.00767C4A at usgs.gov>
>>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>>>
>>>If you don't use Sercel L-4C sensors you can delete this.
>>>
>>>We recently found out the hard way that a batch of "new" seismometer
>>>caps were wired with reverse polarity from the factory. This is
>>>something we have never really checked before. The red lead
>>>(positive, high) should go to the bottom contacts (closest to the
>>>tip). We haven't bought many replacements over the years but we did
>>>buy a batch of a dozen last year. It appears they were all wired in
>>>reverse. Fortunately we caught the problem before we had too many
>>>deployed and they were all a day trip away.
>>>
>>>If you have purchased new caps from Sercel in the past year I
>>>recommend you check the polarity.
>>>
>>>Dave
>>
>>-------------- next part --------------
>>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>URL:
>><http://geohazards.usgs.gov/pipermail/anss-netops/attachments/20120304/d40adf89/attachment-0001.html>
>>
>>------------------------------
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>ANSS-netops mailing list
>><mailto:ANSS-netops at geohazards.usgs.gov>ANSS-netops at geohazards.usgs.gov
>>https://geohazards.usgs.gov/mailman/listinfo/anss-netops
>>
>>
>>End of ANSS-netops Digest, Vol 36, Issue 3
>>******************************************
>>
>_______________________________________________
>ANSS-netops mailing list
>ANSS-netops at geohazards.usgs.gov
>https://geohazards.usgs.gov/mailman/listinfo/anss-netops
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://geohazards.usgs.gov/pipermail/anss-netops/attachments/20120305/600e6461/attachment.html>
More information about the ANSS-netops
mailing list