[EHPweb] statistics on Latest EQ referrels from quake to earthquake servers

[Jeremy M Fee]

50% is worst case, if every current user views the same number of  
pages.  Also, I'm not sure if mod_deflate or caching were ever  
configured for quake.wr.


Jeremy


On Jun 16, 2009, at 11:27 AM, Stan wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 01:17:41PM -0600, Lisa A Wald wrote:
>> --> so if ALL those quake hits came to ehp, it would introduce 50%
>> more edge hits for Akamai, but very few more for the backend servers,
>> since they would be cached CA/NV maps.
>
> One would think. But it does seem that backend traffic rises and falls
> with the total edge traffic, so it's going to increase the load on the
> ehp servers.
>
> -- 
> Stan Schwarz                | Extreme sports...offer "some kind of  
> physical
> System Administrator        | analog to the thrill of installing  
> Linux or
> USGS Pasadena Office        | other open-source operating systems."
> http://pasadena.wr.usgs.gov |           -Mikki Halpin, _The Geek  
> Handbook_
> _______________________________________________
> EHPweb mailing list
> EHPweb at geohazards.usgs.gov
> https://geohazards.usgs.gov/mailman/listinfo/ehpweb